In my recent interview with Prof. Clarita Carlos on DWAR Abante Radyo – Walang Atrasan (March 13), one of the most compelling points raised was the Philippines’ potential engagement with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). This regional bloc, led by China and Russia, has steadily expanded its scope—from security to economics, culture, and humanitarian cooperation. Its membership now includes India, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus, with several ASEAN countries expressing interest.

Prof. Carlos has long advocated for strategic autonomy and multi-alignment. Her view is clear: the Philippines must not lean exclusively toward the United States or China, but instead pursue policies rooted in its own national interest. In this context, the SCO represents a possible platform for diversifying partnerships and reducing dependence on traditional alliances.

The SCO accounts for nearly half of the world’s population and a significant share of global GDP. Closer cooperation could open doors to new economic opportunities, enhanced security collaboration, and broader diplomatic engagement. At a time when terrorism, drug trafficking, and arms smuggling remain pressing threats, the SCO’s experience and networks could prove valuable.

Yet, the challenges are equally clear. The SCO is often seen as a counterweight to U.S.-led alliances such as QUAD and AUKUS. For the Philippines, deepening ties with the SCO raises the question: how do we balance this with our longstanding relationship with America? As Prof. Carlos emphasized, the real test lies in maintaining equilibrium—engaging with multiple blocs without compromising national security or economic stability.

Diplomacy is never free. Every step carries consequences. If the SCO can provide the Philippines with stronger tools against terrorism and new economic opportunities, then it deserves serious consideration. But if it risks placing us in the crossfire of great power rivalry, caution is warranted. 

Prof. Carlos’ reminder resonates: multi-alignment is the only trajectory the Philippines should take. The challenge is to craft a foreign policy that is independent, pragmatic, and firmly anchored in the interests of the Filipino people.